Click for the latest Bainbridge weather forecast.

This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Grace Christian Academy to hold Finer Things tonight | Main | Vehicle flips in accident at intersection of Pine and Sims »
    Thursday
    Oct222009

    Whitehead Conviction Overturned By Supreme Court of Georgia

    In a document dated October 16th, 2009, from the Court of Appeals of Georgia, regarding Whitehead v. State, Whitehead challenged his conviction on several grounds, including insufficiency of evidence.

    Richard Dennis Whitehead (37), formerly employed as an English teacher at Bainbridge High School, was convicted in December 2007 of unlawful sexual contact with a 17 year old student registered at the school and was found guilty and sentenced to 20 years in prison, with 20 years to serve. Whitehead was originally arrested March 23, 2007 and charged with 9 counts of sexual assault.

    The Court of Appeals Of Georgia affirmed Whitehead's conviction, ruling that the evidence was sufficient to show that Whitehead had "supervisory or disciplinary authority" over the 17 year old student as required for conviction under OCGA 16-6-5.1(b) which provides that "...a supervisor of another person referred to in this Code Section commits sexual assault when he or she engages in sexual contact with another person.... who is enrolled in school.... and such actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over such other person."

    The Supreme Court of Georgia granted Whitehead's petition for review by the higher court and remanded the case for further consideration given the recent Supreme Court's decision in Chase v. State Of Georgia. In Chase v. Georgia, the Supreme Court addressed the question of whether OCGA 16-6-5.1 (c) (3) which provides that " consent of the victim shall not be a defense to a prosecution under this subsection" also applies to charges brought under OCGA 16-6-5.1(b). The Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, ruling that "the General Assembly intended to eliminate consent as a defense to the crimes created by this subsection (c) ONLY. Thus, the Supreme Court concluded that as to the alleged victims who were over age of consent, " subsection (c) (3) did not remove consent of the alleged victim as a viable defense to a charge of sexual assault of a person enrolled in school, because the crime was created by the subsection(b) of the statute, not subsection (c). In Chase v. State, the alleged victim was 16 years old and therefore over the age of consent; and the Supreme Court held that the trial court erred in preventing the defendant from raising consent as a defense at trial".

    In light of the Supreme Court's interpretation of OCGA 16-6-5.1(b), "we conclude that the evidence adduced against Whitehead was insufficient to support his conviction.... the alleged victim, was a high school student over the age of consent. (The student).. testified that no force was used in any of the sexual contacts between her and Whitehead; that their friendship was mutual; and that she herself had asked Whitehead how far he wanted to take the relationship. In short, the record reflects that the alleged victim in this case consented to the sexual contacts with Whitehead. Thus, Whiteheads conduct with the alleged victim was not a crime because the "victim" was over the age of consent when the contact occurred and was a willing participant in the sexual activity. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Georgia reverses Whitehead's conviction.

    In light of the Supreme Court ruling, Whitehead will be released from the Calhoun State Prison in Morgan Georgia, where he has been serving his 20 year sentence, perhaps within the next week or so. The overturning of the conviction will result in a clearing of this matter from Whitehead's record and all previous requirements to register as a sex offender will no longer be applicable. Whitehead was not previously eligible for release until 2027. 

    District Attorney Joseph K. Mullholland stated "While the conviction was certainly iron clad, based upon the laws that were in effect at the time, this Supreme Court decision is the final word. We do plan on working with legislators during the next session to correct this technicality and specify the consent issue with clarification to teachers and students under age 18. However, once the Supreme Court has reversed the conviction, Richard Whitehead can not be re-tried for this particular instance. He will be a free man."

    To review the court documents regarding Whitehead v.The State of Georgia and basis(es) for the overturning of the conviction, click here.

    In November 2006, 28 year old Melissa Lee Chase was a highly regarded teacher and coach at Harlem High School in Harlem, Georgia that had developed a friendship with a 16 year old female student. The friendship later developed into a sexual relationship. According to testimony from the "victim", she had "pushed" the relationship with Garcia, which was later ruled by the Supreme Court, in fact to be consensual.

    To review the court documents regarding the case used as a basis for the decision Chase v. State of Georgia click here.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (15)

    I am so glad to see justice finally served. He was wrong, but he did not derserve 20 yrs in my opinion. I have a 17 year old daughter and I would hold her partly responsible for this had it happened to her. Too many of these female teachers are having sex with boys younger than 15 and get no prison time and IT JUST WASN'T FAIR.
    October 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterConcerned State Employee
    It is scary that a "State Employee" thinks that because other PEDIFILES get away that we should not punish any. This was a man that knowingly entered a relationship with a MINOR. This man is a habitual offender who now has NO record to follow him. These people do not change their behavior just victims.
    October 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMr. Awsome
    I am so glad to see that "Free Whitehead" has finally become a reality.
    October 22, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterconcerned citizen
    FREE WHITEHEAD is finally real...yayyy!!
    October 22, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterfinally
    have to agree with Mr. Awesome and say that he will not change his behavior, just his victim. This was not the first student at Bainbridge High School that he had a sexual relationship with. Even if consensual, he was a figure of authority, someone with many more years of experience, and was able to easily manipulate young girls into getting into bed. I think that is sick. No, I don't believe that he deserved 20 years of his life taken away, but to have his record wiped clean, so he can move to a new city, a new school, and prey on a whole different group of girls, that is where I don't agree. Consensual or not, it was wrong.
    October 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSlightly disgusted
    I didn't say that he shouldn't be held accountable, and should not be punished. I just think the punishment should be the same for men and women committing the same crime. A young child is so much different than a 17 yr old who is not forced into the act. Sooooo much different.
    October 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterConcerned State Employee
    I can not believe that any parent in their right mind would think that their child (even if they are 17) would be partly responsible for something like this happening to them. HELLO.......he was 36. I promise you IF THIS DID happen to your daughter you would be singing a different tune right about now. You should really think about the OTHERS in our town and other town that he has done this and now we are just suppose to let him come back like nothing ever happened. I wouldn't want my child to be around him and can't see how you would!! I just praying that he will move some where besides Bainbridge..........I think he has caused enough heartache in this town to last a lifetown. His children do no deserve this. His EX doesn't deserve it at all. Here she is trying finally get you life on track and to move on............and now this. It just doesn't seem right, You never know it may be your child and then we wil see how much of your big talk works and if you will actually use it. Unless you leave
    October 23, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdisbelief
    having known whiteheard from a previous high school, this incident did not only occur at bainbridge high school but also at the high school he taught at in florida. nothing happened to him there either but many people were aware that it was going on. i believe it will happen again and again until he is actually convicted and left in prison.
    October 26, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterformer student
    While I don't think he deserved 20 years, what he did should be considered a felony. The law needs to be changed to discourage this kind of thing from happening again. He got off on a technicality. To think that it is perfectly legal for a teacher to have sex with an underage student (as long as he's not her teacher at the time) is crazy.
    October 26, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterFlorida parent
    Well, so he's not a criminal, only a philanderer, and that shouldn't make a big splash in Bainbridge GA, where it seems to be the favorite sport of so many of its citizens. I know... I worked in an hotel lounge. :)
    October 27, 2009 | Registered CommenterMuuneejah
    I went to school with his daughter, and I feel very sorry for her that her father did that with girls her age. I wonder what their relationship is going to be like now. I don't agree with what he did. I do think he should have a few years. Who wants someone like this teaching their children, their teenage daughters, with no idea what's going on? I also don't think it's fair that the girl easily got to move on knowing that she gave consent for him to pretty much go to jail.
    October 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterVery Sorry
    I know this sociopath and can say that he will do this again. He's a real work. Likes to play on women's sympathy and tell them how he had it so bad in his marriage that he's complelled to do this, and that he just can't help it. Poor Richard.
    November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSick of Whitehead
    I don´t really have a lot of sympathy for women who fall for these lines. Even 17 year old ones. In Georgia, a person is considered legally responsible for their actions as an adult. Commit a crime at 17, and you are prosecuted in the adult system. If a 17 year old is capable of knowing murder, stealing, drugs are illegal and wrong, then more so screwing around with married men. The truth is, the only victims here are his wife and daughter, and that is not a victimhood that is redressible in a court, less it be civil court and she suing for divorce.
    November 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHmmmn
    “If A equals success, then the formula is A equals X plus Y and Z, with X being work, Y play, and Z keeping your mouth shut.”

    -Albert Einstein

    you all live in glass houses, be careful when throwing the first stone.
    November 21, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterClaire Whitehead
    I agree, we ALL live in in glass houses, and I sure dont think anyone should be casting stones. Aint no perfect folks, especially in Bainbridge Ga. Leave the Whiteheads alone, they have all been through enough.
    November 21, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAmen Corner

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.